You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience
⏱ 5-minute read
You don’t need a vacancy to start understanding where the best talent sits.
How much does your organisation really know about the senior talent outside its own walls?
Most boards have a detailed understanding of their customers, competitors, financial performance and market position.
Yet when it comes to people, many organisations only begin looking at the external market when a senior vacancy arises.
By then, the clock is already ticking.
Understanding the external talent landscape shouldn’t simply be part of recruitment. It can be an important part of business planning, succession and risk management.
Because knowing who is out there before you need them gives your organisation something extremely valuable: choice.
The traditional approach to senior recruitment is straightforward.
Someone resigns.
A role is defined.
The search begins.
But for business-critical positions, that can mean starting from a standing start at precisely the moment when time matters most.
A more strategic approach begins much earlier.
Which organisations employ the strongest people in your market?
Where is emerging talent developing?
Who has experience of the challenges your organisation is likely to face next?
Which competitors are building particularly strong teams?
And where are skills becoming increasingly difficult to find?
These are useful questions whether you currently have a vacancy or not.
Organisations routinely gather intelligence about their competitors.
They monitor products, pricing, acquisitions, strategy, financial performance and market share.
Talent deserves the same attention.
Senior appointments can provide useful clues about where organisations are heading.
A competitor recruiting heavily into digital, international sales, data or transformation may be signalling a strategic shift.
A new CFO, Publisher or Managing Director may bring capabilities that tell you something about the organisation’s future direction.
People movements are part of market intelligence.
Boards that understand them can gain a broader picture of how their sector is evolving.
Talent mapping is the systematic process of identifying and understanding relevant people in the external market.
It isn’t necessarily about approaching individuals for an immediate vacancy.
Instead, it creates a picture of the talent landscape.
Depending on the requirement, a mapping exercise might explore:
Done well, it provides boards with information they can use long before a recruitment process begins.
Talent mapping sits within a broader approach to talent management. The CIPD highlights the importance of building talent pools and aligning talent strategy with wider business objectives.
External market knowledge can also help organisations assess the strength of their existing teams.
This doesn’t mean constantly comparing employees with potential replacements.
It means understanding what excellent looks like in the wider market.
For example:
Are competitors combining responsibilities differently?
Are certain skills becoming standard in comparable senior positions?
Are new types of executives emerging?
How does the experience of your succession candidates compare with executives performing similar roles elsewhere?
External benchmarking can validate an internal succession plan — or highlight development areas that may otherwise have gone unnoticed.
That makes talent intelligence valuable even when the eventual decision is to promote from within.

Publishing is a relationship-driven sector where specialist knowledge can take years to develop.
Strong executives may have built careers across commissioning, rights, sales, marketing, digital, international markets or commercial management before moving into broader roles.
At the same time, the capabilities publishers need continue to evolve.
International growth, changing routes to market, new technology, intellectual property opportunities and shifts in consumer behaviour can all influence the experience required around the senior table.
Understanding where that expertise exists across the industry can help publishers identify emerging talent, anticipate future capability gaps and plan succession more confidently.
The best time to discover that a particular skill is scarce is before you urgently need to recruit it.

The same principle applies in Financial Services.
Specialist knowledge across areas such as risk, compliance, finance, operations, transformation and customer outcomes can be critical to an organisation’s performance.
Some senior appointments also require a particularly difficult combination of technical knowledge, regulatory credibility, commercial judgement and leadership experience.
Those people may be relatively scarce.
Understanding the market in advance allows organisations to identify where that expertise sits and how competitive the market may be.
In that sense, talent mapping can become part of organisational risk planning.
If a critical executive left tomorrow, would the board know how difficult they would be to replace?
One of the benefits of researching a market properly is discovering people who wouldn’t necessarily appear through conventional recruitment channels.
The strongest potential candidate may not be looking for another job.
They may have no reason to visit a job board.
They may not describe themselves on LinkedIn using the title you’re searching for.
And they may never have considered your organisation.
Executive search therefore involves looking beyond the visible candidate market.
Mapping organisations, structures, responsibilities and career histories can reveal individuals whose experience is relevant even if their current job title suggests otherwise.
Often, the most interesting talent is found by understanding the market rather than simply searching for candidates.
There is another advantage to thinking ahead.
Relationships take time.
If an organisation waits until a vacancy becomes urgent before identifying potential future executives, every conversation begins with an immediate requirement.
A longer-term approach is different.
It allows businesses and their search partners to understand people, careers and aspirations over time.
Someone who isn’t right for an opportunity today may be exactly right in three years.
Likewise, an executive who isn’t ready to move today may become open to a conversation later.
Good executive search networks aren’t built when a vacancy appears.
They’re built continuously.
Ultimately, understanding the external market isn’t about creating a list of people to recruit.
It’s about giving boards better information.
When a senior position changes, the organisation can then make informed choices:
Do we promote internally?
Do we restructure the role?
Do we need different capabilities?
Should we bring in external experience?
What does the market actually look like?
Without external intelligence, those decisions can be based largely on assumption.
With it, boards have context.
And context creates choice.
Ask:
The answers may reveal more about your organisation’s future readiness than you expect.
If a business-critical leader resigned tomorrow, how much would you already know about the talent capable of replacing them?
At Mosaic Executive Search, we work with organisations across Publishing and Financial Services to provide insight into the senior talent market.
Through executive search and talent mapping, we help clients understand where relevant expertise sits, identify emerging talent and benchmark internal succession options — whether they’re recruiting today or planning for the future.
Boardroom Insights | Issue 03
What Does Your Leadership Bench Look Like?
Boardroom Insights | Issue 04
External Hire or Internal Promotion?
Category: Boardroom Insights
⏱ 5-minute read When a senior role becomes vacant, should you back the talent you already have — or bring…
Category: Boardroom Insights
Why leadership strength isn’t just about who’s around the boardroom table today — but who could step up tomorrow. ⏱…